Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

DigoraR¿¡¼­ Á¤·®¿µ»óÀÇ Æ¯¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡

The Assessment on the Characteristics of Quantitative Image in DigoraR

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1999³â 29±Ç 2È£ p.397 ~ 406
±èÀç´ö, ±èÀç´ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀç´ö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇÐ
±èÀç´ö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

°á·Ð
µðÁöÅÐ ±¸³»ÃÔ¿µ ÀåÄ¡ÀÎ Digora¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±× ¿µ»óÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ°í Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ ¿µ»óºÐ
¼®½Ã ±× À¯¿ë¼º°ú ÇѰ踦 ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇØ ±¸³» ¹æ»ç¼±ÃÔ¿µÀåÄ¡´Â Heliodent MD(Siemens Co.,
Germany)·Î ÇÏ°í X¼± °ËÃâ±âÀÎ IP´Â ¼ºÀοëÀ» ÀÏȸ¿ë Çöó½ºÆ½ ¹éÀ» ¾º¿ö¼­ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÂüÁ¶Ã¼·Î´Â IPÀÇ Çϴܺο¡ 10´Ü°èÀÇ ±¸¸®½ºÅÜ¿þÁö¸¦ ºÎÂøÇÏ¿´°í ÃÔ¿µµÈ IP»óÀº ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÚü
ÀÇ ·¹ÀÌÀú ½ºÄ³³Ê¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ºÄµµÇ¾î 256´Ü°èÀÇ °èÁ¶µµ°¡ Áö¿øµÇµµ·Ï µðÁöÅÐÈ­µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿µ»óºÐ
¼®¿¡´Â single color enhancement ¿Í density measurement¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®Àº ÃøÁ¤µÈ ´ç
·®Ä¡ÀÇ Á¤¹Ðµµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀڷμ­ 6°¡Áö ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ³ëÃâÁ¶°Ç¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹è°æ¿µ»ó°ú ±¸
¸®½ºÅÜ¿þÁö °¢°¢¿¡¼­ÀÇ °èÁ¶µµÀÇ º¯È­¿Í ¼¼°³ÀÇ °ÇÁ¶ÇϾǰñÆí ±¸¸® ´ç·®Ä¡ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ
¿© ±Ô°Ý¼ºÀ» °ËÁõÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Á¶»ç½Ã°£°ú Æò±ÕÇȼ¿Ä¡°£¿¡´Â Á÷¼±°ü°è°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
2. ¿µ»óÀÇ Çȼ¿ °¨µµ´Â ±ÕÀÏÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. °¢ºÎÀ§¿¡ µû¸¥ Çȼ¿Ä¡ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¼öÁ÷»óÀ¸·Î º¯¿¬ºÎ¿Í Á߽ɺΰ£¿¡ 60¡­70, ¼öÆò»ó¿¡¼­
´Â º¯¿¬ºÎ¿Í Á߽ɺΰ£¿¡ Çȼ¿Ä¡ 15¡­26 Á¤µµÀÇ Â÷¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
4. ±¸¸®½ºÅÜÀÇ Áß°£ºÎ¿Í ÇϺδ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ Çȼ¿Ä¡Æø³»¿¡¼­ °è´Ü°î¼±À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
5. ¹Ðµµ°¡ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ÇϾǰñÆíÀº ÃøÁ¤½Ã¸¶´Ù °¢±â ±¸¸®´ç·®Ä¡°¡ ´Þ¶ó ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀ» Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ µðÁöÅÐ ±¸³»ÃÔ¿µ ÀåÄ¡ÀÎ Digora´Â Á¤·®¿µ»óÀ¸·Î¼­ Æò°¡µÇ±â¿¡´Â
ÇÑ°è°¡ ÀÖ¾î Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ Æò°¡¸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â X¼± °ËÃâ±âÀÇ º¸¿ÏÀÌ µû¶óÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú
´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : To clarify the usefulness and the limitation of Digora systemR
by evaluating the physical characteristics as the quantitative image on Image Plate(IP).
Materials and Methods : Radiograms were taken by Heliodent MD(Siemens Co.,
Germany) with the image plate for adult, Cu-step wedge as reference material, and
three pieces of dry mandibular bone. Image analysis was performed by single color
enhancement, density measurement with histogram. The relationship between the
exposure conditions and the distribution of the pixel values of the image, the variation
of pixel values of each step of Cu-step wedge at two different area and Cu-equivalent
value of three pieces of dry mandibular bone measure by the conversion equation.
Results : There was no linear relationship between the exposure condition and the
average pixel value of the image, of which the distribution was not even. The pixel
value differences between the center portion and the periphery were ranged from 60 to
70 in vertical plane and from 15 to 26 in horizontal plane. Two plot profile formed at
two different areas of the Cu-step wedge were different. The measured Cu-equivalent
values showed the discrepancy among the times of measurement.
Conclusion : As above results, Image Plate(IP) of Digora systemR
showed the limitation as the quantitative image. The physical property of IP was
expected to need to be compensated for the quantitative evaluation of the bone or
others.

Å°¿öµå

quantitative image; physical characteristic;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸